TechEd 2008: Attack of the Booth Babes

Every tradeshow we go to, we see the typical gimmicks used to drive traffic to the booths: cheesy sales guys juggling, cash giveaways, heck we even try to snag visitors with free t-shirts and assorted giveaways.  It's all part of the game.  This year at TechEd, I couldn't help but notice there were lots of scantily clad, very attractive women posted in front of booths using their "assets" to garner attention.  I'm not talking about dressing nice or even a blouse that may be a little too low cut.  I'm talking about very, very short and tight skirts, high heels, and the low-cut shirts.   Standing out in front of booths, smiling and walking the floors and watching as the heads turn.   I've seen it all before, but the amount that I saw this year just struck me as cheap, cheesy, and just plain wrong.

I was relieved to find out I wasn't alone in my sentiment.  Standing in the booth in my khakis, button down shirt and badge,  I talked with a few of my colleagues who agreed.  One of them in particular thought it unbelievable we are still seeing women being paraded around like this in the same year when we were very close to having our first female presidential nominee.  Another one of my male colleagues noted that he was quite surprised to discover that a professional conference such as TechEd shared the same "booth babe" gimmick that is often found at big comic book conventions, which are usually male dominated.

Now, of course there will be people who say I'm just jealous of those beautiful girls with the long legs.  Don't I wish I looked like that in a mini-skirt?  Hell yes I do!  Of course I'm jealous of those girls - they're gorgeous!  Do they have every right to wear what they want?  Yes.  Whether it's good genes, many hours at the gym, or passing up on the M&M jar at their office, they've certainly done something right and should be proud of their bodies.  Being a woman in today's world means being able to be feminine, show emotions, and still be taken seriously.  But how far is too far? 

For all I know, these are shrewd business women.  Maybe they are respected professionals in their field, highly educated.  It's more about the perception and no matter how you justify them being there, it's the fact that their presence continues to feed that perception: that these women are brainless bimbos being paid by companies solely to give these techies some eye candy in a conference where 10% of the attendees are women.  And as women, if we can help change that awful perception, shouldn't we do everything we can to change it?? 

Women today still deal with real issues facing equality: glass ceilings and the kids vs. a career trade off to name just a couple.  We've come a long, long way. We still have misconceptions to correct, barriers to break through, and stereotypes to prove wrong.  Yes, we're women in a typically male dominated industry and yes we can write, code, direct, and market anything just as well as a man can.  Yes, we can do that and wear whatever the heck we want and look good at the same time.  So let's use that power and momentum to continue to achieve and change these negative perceptions. 

And to the companies who would certainly benefit from attracting the many talented and hard working women out there, don't send the absolute worst message by letting only the women in the tight skirts be in your booth!  Let's hope that these companies have enough of a product and/or service to stand behind that they don't need this type of attraction to generate business.   

So, for you guys and gals out there, what's your opinion of booth babes?  Guys - does it appeal to you?  Gals - does this offend your feminist ways or are you all for it? 

 


Posted Jun 16 2008, 09:11 AM by EmilyBien

Comments

Nate Sullivan wrote re: TechEd 2008: Attack of the Booth Babes
on Mon, Jun 16 2008 11:31 AM

I'll tell you what appeals to me -- that jar of M&M's you mentioned. That thing is irresistible.

SReed wrote re: TechEd 2008: Attack of the Booth Babes
on Mon, Jun 16 2008 12:12 PM

Great topic! I'm with you...technology, what's a tight skirt got to do with it anyway? I'm always amazed at the lengths some companies will go to to get attention in the surreal tradeshow world.  In my mind tight skirts and flashy gimmicks = low quality products, low integrity company.

Does it offend, not really but I wonder if those who wear them know how they are perceived? After all what does a company need to operate and grow - skills and business acumen or looking good in a tight skirt?

DaisyAnand wrote re: TechEd 2008: Attack of the Booth Babes
on Mon, Jun 16 2008 2:57 PM

Thank you for posting on this topic, we need to speak up about this issue and voice our discontent.  

I had attended the Women in Technology luncheon at Tech Ed where we heard from Eileen Brown, Microsoft IT Pro Evangelism Manger, and a panel of women representing different sized companies – from large corporation to one person firm, Christine Betts -Microsoft, Elisabeth Vanderveldt -Conamex, Rhonda Layfield - RJL and Zaakera Stratman -Microsoft.  The talks were inspiring and the Q&A brought up issues stemming from the minority representation of women in technology, the glass ceiling and how we are making strides in both areas.

I spoke with Zaakera Stratman after the session and raised the issue of how the presence of Booth Babes at a show like TechEd is very demeaning to the attendees and probably more so for any female employees of the vendors who had resorted to using women as props.  Having a women in technology panel in the same show where women were being used as lures by the vendors seemed very hypocritical.   I then asked her how the organizers felt about their presence.  She was glad that I had brought it up and that she would take it back to the organizing committee as an issue and something to manage in the next TechEd.

There's another long year before the next TechEd so let's see if there if there is noticeable decline in the number of vendor's using booth babes and can we hope for none at all?”

TechEd 2008: attack of the booth babes wrote TechEd 2008: attack of the booth babes
on Mon, Jun 16 2008 7:23 PM

Pingback from  TechEd 2008: attack of the booth babes

Steve Gaitten wrote re: TechEd 2008: Attack of the Booth Babes
on Tue, Jun 17 2008 10:49 AM

Great post Emily!  I also noticed the phenomenon at Tech Ed '08.  While I enjoyed the eye candy, I will tell you that I didn't visit any of vendors represented by 'booth babes'.  Call me (and 5,000 of my pocket protector wearing brethren) a nerd, but I was intimidated by these sirens, not attracted to them.  I was highly skeptical that they could intelligently discuss the products they were representing, and the "sexualization" of the booth is just plain awkward and embarassing.  Not only did I not visit these vendors, but I now have no memory of who they are.

Lily wrote re: TechEd 2008: Attack of the Booth Babes
on Wed, Jun 18 2008 10:36 AM

Oh, the lengths people will go to sell stuff!  I'm with Nate - give me M&M's and I may buy just about anything!

medtechgirl wrote re: TechEd 2008: Attack of the Booth Babes
on Wed, Jun 18 2008 2:57 PM

Its the same story at medical/research conferences, not to mention the vendors that walk <i>every</i> hallway of our huge medical complex in high heels and short skirts. Frankly, it makes me very uncomfortable to see these women dressed the way they are.

I agree with you that as smart and talented as these women might be (and probably are), this 'dress code' seems to negate their talents as related to the products they sell in favor of an image that so many of us work hard to move past by pursuing careers that we love.

anonymous (sexist) coward wrote re: TechEd 2008: Attack of the Booth Babes
on Wed, Jun 18 2008 3:18 PM

Uhm...  How many people read this post because they expected to see pictures of said booth babes?

EmilyBien wrote re: TechEd 2008: Attack of the Booth Babes
on Wed, Jun 18 2008 3:27 PM

To medtechgirl: Loved your comment and totally agree.  I am surprised to hear that it happens in your field too...I guess it's more common than I thought.  At these medical conferences, is it more equal men/women or is it also male dominated?

medtechgirl wrote re: TechEd 2008: Attack of the Booth Babes
on Wed, Jun 18 2008 4:01 PM

I straddle the line between a computer programmer and biomedical researcher (I've studied and worked in both fields) and I will agree that it happens WAY more in your field.

The gender ratio in my experience varies between levels of stratification: students and other trainees are equal in gender, with a slight bias towards females (probably reflecting the gender ratio of students at large in the US right now), while speakers and higher ups tend to be male dominated.

In general it seems that academia is still stratified in this manner, and biomedical research follows suit.

Voldox wrote re: TechEd 2008: Attack of the Booth Babes
on Thu, Jun 19 2008 1:34 AM

When I went to Teched in Aus a few years ago we were told before hand that there would be no "Booth Babes", it was part of the Vendor's Agreement. There were a few that maybe slightly crossing the line but it's really unnecessary. The attendee's are going to be more impressed with the latest and greatest Software and Technology. Well they should be :)

Eugene Rosenfeld wrote re: TechEd 2008: Attack of the Booth Babes
on Thu, Jun 19 2008 12:00 PM

I've been in the IT industry for many years, and I noticed the trend of booth babes at IT conferences several years ago. I am disappointed in the industry for going down this route. I think that in many cases this tactic detracts from vendors’ success rather than adds to it, as Steve had alluded to. I also tend not to visit these booths, because I simply cannot take a vendor who uses booth babes seriously. Many people I have spoken to feel the same way. Hopefully vendors will take notice and we can put the booth babes trend in our past.

JanetG wrote re: TechEd 2008: Attack of the Booth Babes
on Fri, Jun 20 2008 2:41 PM

I hope the trend lessens too; it could be worse.  My friend Kristy works in sales in the industrial welding industry and said that at the trade shows her company exhibits at, not only do they have booth babes dressed a la Victoria's Secret, but the booth giveaway is a calendar of all the girls! Ewwww!

About EmilyBien

Please note that my head is not quite as large as the picture shows.  I mean that literally.  Figuratively, it may be quite right. 

Bamboo Solutions Corporation, 2002-2009